🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". A law could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban is "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to enact a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a advisory motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," commented one European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing social media material contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design tools that are secure and suitable for children," stated a leading peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, legislation is mostly happening at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various individuals to mimic this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of the West, other countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies strike a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this global discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers globally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.